The results support findings of previous studies that older drivers tend to avoid driving in suboptimal conditions. Within the 30-to-60-year-old group, age was not significant. Probability decreases with age for same-direction collision types but increases with age for vehicle-turning collision types, this indicates that difficulty with intersections increases for older drivers. As a factor, age is elastic for same-direction and vehicle-turning crashes. The older drivers are significantly more prone to collisions related to vehicle turning and intersecting paths-particularly at signalized intersections-than are 30-to-60-year-old drivers. Multinomial logit vehicle-to-vehicle collision outcome models that account for driver, vehicle, roadway, environmental, and temporal characteristics were created for drivers age 65 and older and a comparison group of drivers 30 to 60 years old. The types of collisions incurred by older drivers are compared with those of drivers 30 to 60 years old in vehicle-to-vehicle collisions using the General Estimates System 2002–2003 sampling of reported motor vehicle collisions compiled by the NHTSA National Center for Statistics and Analysis. The number of older drivers (65+ years old) is increasing as a result of the baby boom generation reaching retirement age and an increase in driver's license holders among the elderly. Utilizing these experiences by considering economic and social differences can be useful and practical for middle and low-income countries. This study explained that clinical assessment is normally performed in drivers older than 75 years old to diagnose disorders and treat and prevent them in distinct time periods.Ĭonclusion: Most high-income countries have worthwhile experience in measuring and improving the fitness to drive in the elderly and enforce different laws according to environmental, social, and political conditions. The most significant supporting policies included introducing alternative transportation to preserve the independence of the elderly. In most all reports and papers, there were policies on empowering the elderly driver, including providing safe driving tips, optional driving skills tests, holding retraining courses, and so on. General practitioners were the principal performers to measure driving fitness. The in-person, postal, and online renewal of license were the most common method of renewal. Vision assessment was the main item to judge the fitness to drive in the elderly, followed by driving assessment, cognitive assessment, and motor assessment. Results: Eventually, 24 papers and reports were included in the study. In this study, the Arkesy and O’Malley frameworks were employed. Method: Expected data were collected using keywords older, old, elderly, aging, ageing, senior, polic*, process, programme, plan, guideline, framework, driving capacity, driving eligibility, safe drive, fitness to drive, renewal driving license, commercial driver, driving qualification, driving ability, driving evaluation, driving assessment and their Persian equivalents from various English-language databases included: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Persian-language databases Included: IranDoc, SID, and MagIran. Accordingly, this study has been conducted to analyze the processes, models, and policies to assessment fitness to drive and improving driving in the elderly in the world. Furthermore, similar regulations or education programs aimed at older drivers might improve crash experience for these individuals, especially those older than 75.īackground: Several countries in the world have distinct policies and frameworks to assessment and promote fitness to drive in the elderly. These results suggest that the new graduated driver licensing restrictions in place in Connecticut will reduce crashes and that there is the potential to improve young driver safety further by extending these restrictions. For older drivers the risk also increases at night and on freeways (and for single-vehicle crashes on local roads) however, older drivers are less likely to cause crashes when traveling with passengers. The results show that young driver risk increases at night, on freeways (and for single-vehicle crashes on local roads), as well as with increased numbers of passengers. The quasi-induced exposure technique was used with police-reported crashes between 19. For young drivers, the age of the passengers was also considered. The specific objective of this study was to assess the relative propensity of young (16 to 20 years old) or older (65 years and older) drivers in Connecticut to be at fault in a traffic crash when they (a) travel at night, (b) travel on different classes of roadway (freeway versus state route versus local road), and (c) travel with different numbers of passengers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |